I am Not a Lumberjack and I’m Not Actually OK; Angry Gambler Strikes Straight Back

Not everyone carrying an axe is a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Most likely not, since most lumberjacks do not carry their axes generally around with them on evenings out. But two stories have popped up in the news showing that non-lumberjacks don’t stick to these necessarily rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence happened in a town bar in Fontaniva, Italy, in which a disgruntled gambler decided to exact his revenge on some unsuspecting slots devices after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in two weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video websites that are streaming where watchers can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing down steam, the machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but maybe not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either it was an indicator of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. Whenever coping with crazy, interpretations are anybody’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.
‘ He comes in here all the time to relax and play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a complete great deal of cash. He is a laborer and only works every now and then.’ Apparently, this is one worker whom keeps their equipment that is own handy.
‘He’s normally a tremendously man that is quiet. He just strolled in very calmly having an axe and smashed all the devices. There had been several customers by them at that time plus they were terrified,’ he added.
The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But prison overcrowding got him off with nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The next of these two stories is a bit more frightening, since the axe was wielded not during the slots, but at a person in the staff at a shop that is betting the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting shop in Cardiff ‘in a state of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making down with some money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over his head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or worse if he don’t comply.
A authorities spokesperson investigating the criminal activity said that two men, both ski that is wearing, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm in the nights the incident. One calmly endured guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant utilizing the tree-chopping weapon.
The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police referred to casinopokies777.com as a ‘quantity of money,’ and also the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by a suspect that is third.
Police are now appealing to the neighborhood public for information that could assist apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did maybe not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up in the scene.
Whose Casino Is It Anyhow? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
While every of the 3 licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has already established its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight on the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one such proposition that would put a casino within the neighboring town of Everett.
Voting Rights
The legal choice is pertaining to the concept that neighboring communities could be afflicted with casino projects, but won’t have the opportunity to vote on whether those casinos is opened in the beginning. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, an applicant for mayor of Boston, was one of a handful of prospects who have recommended that all of Boston should be able to vote on a casino that would be based in East Boston, for instance.
When it comes down to the proposed Wynn casino task in Everett, Conley claims that allowing only Everett residents to vote onto it is unfair to the surrounding communities. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would register suit to stop the Everett casino based in the impact it might have on many Boston areas.
‘The Wynn proposal was voted…on in just one community,’ Conley said throughout a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will keep its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social receive none of the proposed advantages.’
In line with the state laws that produced the window of opportunity for three new casinos in Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get a vote on whether or not allowing the projects to be built. However, casino designers are needed to negotiate compensation, with arbitration needed in the event that gambling enterprises and governments that are localn’t arrived at a resolution by themselves.
Conley has proposed taking a path that isn’t actually outlined in the 2011 casino law regarding the East Boston casino proposal, one that’s being developed by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He would have the whole city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while still granting East Boston veto power within the vote that is entire. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten applicants supported allowing the entire town to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents discovered that 44% were and only the casino, while 37% opposed it.
No matter if voters return these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by their state due to the fact site that is future of casino in the Boston area. Along with the Everett and East Boston casino plans, additionally there is a contending proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken up to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing celebrity of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got their own hand caught in the activities book cookie container after accepting a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired premier activities betting company CEO.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a betting shop critic who has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nonetheless accepted the big donation from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing members of the Conservative Party to call the shadow business secretary out, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double criteria.
Since Gala Coral Group is certainly one of the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for the large numbers of gambling outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the nation- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign directed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the neighborhood roads of his London that is south Streatham, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to get a handle on the number of betting shops.’
‘I understand there was concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily replenishing with betting shops and pay day loan businesses that take advantage of our community, as opposed to help us,’ wrote Umunna in a written report to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly ever believe anything Chuka Umunna claims?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says something in public areas and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that is very uncommon for the politician.
Spared on a Technicality
But, fighting back the corner of the Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna reported that ‘this donation was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a individual capacity, and was accepted in respect because of the rules and properly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the office of Chuka Umunna in his capacity as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, and for staffing,’ so it can officially pass as legitimate.
And even though Goulden is not any longer head of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he invested as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it is a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or not the Conservative Party that are searching to destroy the publicity of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after using such a difficult stance against the spread of the industry in their regional constituency.
‘ The thing that is only know he certainly believes is that the capital is filled with ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ stated Bob Neill.
Umunna, that is thought to be considered a future Labour Party leader, has already experienced his share that is fair of as earlier this season his office had been accused of modifying his Wikipedia page showing comparisons between himself and Barack Obama.